Feb 28 2011

The Antigay Reverend Grant Storms has been arrested for masturbating in a park!

Grant Storms, the former pastor who has led charges against the annual Southern Decadence festival in the French Quarter, has been arrested in Lafreniere Park by the Jefferson Parish sheriff's department on obscenity charges.

On the afternoon of Feb. 25, a mother unloading her children from a car to take them to a nearby playground alerted authorities to a man in a Ford Windstar van parked near the playground. The man, she told sheriffs' deputies, was masturbating. Storms told officers on the scene he wasn't masturbating, but instead attempting to urinate in a bottle in the van. This afternoon, he admitted concocting that story — "I was ashamed" — but did not admit to masturbating. "I'm confessing to having my hand in my pants," Storms said. "That's all I'm going to say," adding the truth "will come out in court."

Speaking in the parking lot of a motel on the I-10 Service Road in Metairie, where he had been staying since his arrest, Storms struggled for composure, at times breaking down in tears as he described the effect his arrest had on his wife and four children, the youngest of whom are nine and six years old. "I'll have to tell them, 'Daddy has a problem,'" he said, weeping.

Storms wanted to clear the record on one issue in particular: that he was parked in the vicinity of the Lafreniere playspot to watch children. "I am not a pedophile," he said. "I am not a child molester."

This is the same guy that filmed lewd acts at Southern Decadence in an effort to get cops to just shut it down completely.

Share

Oct 29 2010

Costliest Divorces – If you thought Tiger Woods divorce was big money, think again!

The recent marriage of Katy Perry and Russell Brand got me thinking... no pre-nup is a wonderful way to start a marriage, but in this day and age of fair weather marriages of people in the limelight, that could be costly! When two high profile and wealthy people do wed, it seems a more practical and smart move to see the business side that it is also a "merger", not just a marriage.

When a marriage goes sour, the process of divorce becomes increasingly more complicated when the couple's net worth is in the stratosphere. The absence of an official prenuptial agreement, differences in international law and the circumstances surrounding of the breakup can result in large sums being paid out in the divorce settlement.

Although most settlements don't get finalized until well after the divorce takes place, there was speculation that the divorce between Tiger Woods and his wife could cost the world's No. 1 golfer up to $300 million , among the costliest in history. Other breakups that could enter the top rankings include Mel Gibson and Robyn Gibson, whose split has the potential to be the most expensive in Hollywood history, with speculation it could hit $500 million.

Read on to hear the movers and shakers who don't even make the headlines...

15. Kevin Costner and Cindy Silva

Settlement Amount: $80 million

After 16 years of marriage and three children, actor Kevin Costner and wife Cindy Silva decided to end their marriage in 1994. Although the situation was settled privately, Cindy received $80 million from Costner in the wake of the divorce.

14. Harrison Ford and Melissa Mathison

Settlement Amount: $85 million

Another costly divorce settlement was the 2004 breakup between actor Harrison Ford and Hollywood regular Melissa Mathison, who was also known for writing the script for Spielberg's E.T. After 18 years of marriage and two children, the couple decided to call it quits in 2004. Without a prenuptial agreement, Mathison was awarded a sum of approximately $85 million.

13. Madonna and Guy Ritchie

Settlement Amount: $76 - $92 Million

In December 2008, pop star Madonna and director Guy Ritchie broke up their marriage of 8 years. Madonna's representatives confirmed the settlement was between $76-$92 million. Although Ritchie was worth an estimated $45 million at the time and said he wasn't interested in a substantial portion of his ex-wife's wealth, the settlement surely wasn't bad news for the successful director.

12. (Tied) Sumner and Phyllis Redstone

Settlement Amount: $100 Million

In a marriage that lasted 52 years, Sumner Redstone, the majority owner and chairman of National Amusements, which owns CBS, Viacom and MTV Networks, went through divorce proceedings with his wife, Phyllis. As the marriage dated back to less-complicated legal and financial times (no prenuptial agreement was signed by either party) reports at the time speculated that Phyllis stood to receive between $1.5 - $2.5 billion.

Although the final amount was never officially made public, the Los Angeles Times reported that Phyllis received only $100 million, citing a source close to the family. Following the 1999 divorce, Redstone eventually remarried Paula Fortunato, another marriage that ended in divorce. This time, however, a prenuptial agreement awarded Ms. Fortunato $5 million, stipulating that she would receive $1 million for every year of marriage.

11. (Tied) Steven Speilberg and Amy Irving

Settlement Amount: $112 million

When they first met in 1984, Spielberg was well into his directing career and Amy Irving was an aspiring actress. Four years later, the couple ended their marriage in a $112 million settlement, which was half of Spielberg's net worth at the time. The couple actually did have a prenuptial agreement, but this was eventually thrown out in court, as it was written on a cocktail napkin and there were no legal witnesses. It turned out to be quite a costly mistake.

10. Greg Norman and Laura Andrassy

Settlement Amount: $103 million

After 25 years of marriage, Australian golfer Greg Norman split with his wife, Laura Andrassy, handing over $103 million in the divorce settlement. Norman left Andrassy in 2006 for Chris Evert, who was the #1 ranked women’s tennis player at one time, but this marriage dissolved after only 15 months.

9. Neil Diamond and Marica Murphey

Settlement Amount: $150 million

After 25 years of marriage, singer Neil Diamond and his then-wife Marcia split in 1996 after rumors of Neil's infidelity encouraged her to file for divorce. In the settlement, although the official numbers were never made public, Diamond has been quoted as saying that Marcia had received $150 million in the divorce.

8. Michael and Juanita Jordan

Settlement Amount: $168 million

Basketball legend Michael Jordan and his wife Juanita split up in 2006 after 17 years of marriage, and one year later came to a divorce settlement of $168 million. The couple considered divorce in January 2002, but reconciled their differences shortly thereafter. At the time, Jordan had been quoted as saying that he was willing to pay a premium to expedite the breakup proceedings.

7. Michael and Maya Polsky

Settlement Amount: $184 million

In 2003, Maya Polsky, wife of Michael Polsky, filed for divorce and wound up settling for $184 million. Polsky, the founder, president and CEO of Invenergy LLC had an estimated $368 million in cash and assets with his wife prior to the divorce, and she got half of it.

The couple, which married in 1975 in the Ukraine, moved to the US in 1976 with little assets and only $500 in cash. Polsky made his fortune by starting various energy companies, including SkyGen Energy (which he sold in 2000 for $450 million) and Invenergy, which is a Chicago-based wind energy company.

6. Roman and Irina Abramovich

Settlement Amount: $300 million

In what had the potential to be the most expensive divorce settlement of all-time, Roman Abramovich's divorce from Irina Abramovich only ended up costing the Russian billionaire $300 million. At the time (2007) Roman was listed by Forbes as the 16th richest man in the world, and it was speculated that Irina could be awarded up to half of her former husband's $18.7 billion. Instead, she was awarded less than 2 percent of his fortune.

Don't feel bad for her, however, as assets are reported to have included cash, mansions in Britain and Moscow, a yacht and a private plane. Reports from the time note that Irina could have gotten more from Roman, citing a 50/50 split of wealth under Russian law, but she had not explicitly tried to get a larger chunk of his holdings.

5. Robert and Sheila Johnson

Settlement Amount: $400 million

Robert Johnson, the co-founder of BET and America's first African-American billionaire, also has one of the biggest divorce settlements in history. After a marriage of over 30 years, the couple split up in 2000 and Sheila received an estimated $400 million in the settlement. Both have continued their business dealings, owning majority stakes in professional men's and women's basketball teams. In 2005, Sheila married William T. Newman Jr., the judge who presided over her original divorce case.

4. Craig and Wendy McCaw

Settlement Amount: $460 million

The Seattle-area businessman and founder of McCaw Cellular, Craig McCaw and his wife Wendy split up, in 1998, just a few years after selling the company to AT&T for between $11-$12 billion. The divorce settlement saw Wendy receive most of her $460 million settlement in Nextel stock, which eventually allowed her to purchase the Santa-Barbara News-Press from the New York Times. When the settlement was finalized, it put her on the Forbes list of the 400 richest Americans, but she soon dropped off after a short run.

3. Adnan and Soraya Khashoggi

Settlement Amount: $874 million

For almost two decades, Saudi billionaire entrepreneur and arms dealer Adnan Kasshoggi held the record for the most expensive divorce settlement in history. Although they filed for divorce in 1974, it took Soraya until 1979 to sue - for a sum of $2.54 billion - her ex-husband for the rights to cash in the wake of their breakup.

In 1982, the couple agreed to a settlement that landed British-born Soraya (originally Sandra Daly) $874 million. At one time, Adnan was estimated to be worth $4 billion, but lost his billionaire status in 2007, with no help from his costly divorce.

2. Bernie and Slavica Ecclestone

Settlement Amount: $1-1.2 billion (estimated)

The 2009 divorce between billionarie Bernie Ecclestone and his wife Slavica was initially thought to be the most expensive in history - in the range of $4 billion. But the final settlement is estimated by various reports to be in the range of $1 billion. The settlement has not been made public, but experts from across the globe believe the latter number is more realistic.

Since the settlement, Slavica, a former Armani model who stands nearly a foot taller than her ex-husband, has been buying some new toys with her wealth, now estimated to be £734 million ($1.2 billion) by the Times of London. Part of her recent shopping spree is a new $60 million private plane.

1. Rupert and Anna Murdoch

Settlement Amount: $1.7 billion

The most expensive divorce in the world to date is between Australian media mogul Rupert Murdoch and his former wife, Anna Murdoch (now Anna Murdoch Mann). After a marriage of 32 years and three children together, the couple split up in 1999. Under the settlement,  $1.7 billion of Rupert's fortune (which included $110 million in cash) went to Anna.

A mere 17 days after the divorce was finalized, Rupert wed Wendi Deng, 38 years his junior, while Anna married investor William Mann several months later.

Share

Aug 20 2010

Bulls Gone Wild!

This is so sad and insane at the same time! I really would like to see this one day, but now...

Share

Jul 16 2010

The Luckiest People Alive!

Share

May 2 2010

Chinese Chef Dies From Eel Stuffed Up His Butt

Doctors in Sichuan, China, found an eel up a 59-year-old man's rectum and the creature had eaten his bowels! The unnamed chef in China was passed out drunk and his friends played a prank on him which went horribly wrong.

WTF kind of sick "friends" are those?! What happened to the classic prank of just drawing dicks on the faces of passed out drinking buddies or posing them in precarious scenarios and taking photos? Crazy, crazy world today...

Share

Mar 17 2010

Whitney Back on Crack?

Please say this not so! She has had such a well publicized comeback, it would truly be heartbreaking if she relapsed. But it does happen...

Share

Mar 10 2010

WITOLA Turns One Year Old Today!

Well it's been a year here already. This started out as a idea to help me learn more about WordPress and manipulating the code for clients and other sites. I am happy with this creative outlet via word, picture or video.

So far looking at my Google stats I've had over 6,488 visitors and 40,385 page views. Pretty cool for a very low key site.

It has been great to share with family and friends my rants, ideas, experiences, etc. I will continue, thanks for stopping by!

Share

Mar 2 2010

World Air Traffic View From Satellite

How many people do you think are in the sky at any given moment? In the video link below you will see air traffic around the world for 24 hours, taken from a satellite. You won't believe this! The yellow dots are airplanes in the sky during a 24 hour period. Click on the image to view the video or the link at the bottom of the post.

Stay with the picture. You will see the light of the day moving from the east to the west, as the Earth spins on it's axis. Also you will see the aircraft flow of traffic leaving the North American continent and traveling at night to arrive in the UK in the morning.

Then you will see the flow changing, leaving the UK in the morning and flying to the American continent in daylight. It is a 24 hour observation of all of the large aircraft flights in the world, condensed down to about 2 minutes. From space we look like a bee hive of activity.

You could tell it was summer time in the north by the sun's foot print over the planet. You could see that it didn't quite set in the extreme north and it didn't quite rise in the extreme south.

I have never seen this before. We are taught about the earth's tilt and how it causes summer and winter and have had to imagine just what is going on. With this 24 hour observation of aircraft travel on the earth's surface we get to see the daylight pattern move as well.

Remember watch the day to night..... Day is over in Australia when it starts.

WorldAirTraffic0-24h

Share

Jan 8 2010

Solar Energy and Net Metering

A friend of mine wrote this article and I thought I would pass this on with his permission. Feel free to follow him as well on Twitter: @HDSolarguy.
Informative and definitely the future, hopefully. Come on people these are the United States... get it together!
Earlier this week, along with 8,000 other people in my neighborhood, we lost power for about 12 hours due to some problem with an electrical cable a few miles from our house. And a LOT of my friends wrote to say, "Hey, I thought you had solar power... how come your power went out?" So I thought I would take a minute to explain.

In the middle of the day, when the sun is overhead, solar panels usually make more power than your house can use. In the old days (pre-2000), you would need to store this extra power in batteries for use at night and whenever the sun was not shining.

This type of solar (called off-grid, since you are basically disconnected from the power line), was very complicated, inefficient and expensive. It's one of the reasons solar didn't catch on for a very long time.

Then, about 12 years ago, many states (including CA) passed net metering laws that forced the electric utilities to buy back any extra solar power you were producing and give you full credit for it.

Most renewable energy is intermittent -- it comes and goes -- so that sometimes, you have too much energy and sometimes, not enough.

With net metering, you stay connected to the power company (on-grid solar) and in the middle of the day, your meter runs BACKWARD for credit as you sell the extra power to the power company. Then, at night, you buy back the power you need and the meter goes forward again.

(Note: There is a great little 5-min video on this at http://www.stellarsolar.net/how.html)

In California (and many other states), you only pay your power bill annually and you pay the net difference between what you've produced and what you've used. If you produce and use the same amount, your net power bill is $0.

Depending on state laws where you live, you may even be able to get extra money back at the end of the year if you produce more power than you use. Imagine that... a power check instead of a power bill. California just passed such a law but is still deciding how to calculate the rates on this extra power; we may not get paid the full rate for it, time will tell.

And this, dear friends, is why solar is still not more widely deployed in these United States. Not because it is too expensive (you can currently produce solar power for about one-third to one-half of what your power company charges).

The problem is that the net metering laws are different in all 50 states and in many of them, you do not get paid full price for your "extra" electricity, even though the power company re-sells it to the business community, usually at a higher price than you would pay as a homeowner.

In fact, there are still five states in which net metering is actually illegal! Missouri recently passed a net metering law in which the utility must pay you no more than $.03 per kWh even though they sell it for over twice that much.

This creates a number of problems for the future of solar energy but there is a simple solution and you may hear more about it this Spring. It's called "National Net Metering" legislation and it would set a common standard for buying and selling solar power -- for everyone, no matter where you live.

The bad news is that it will probably not be discussed alone but in concert with many other even more "controversial" bills dealing with climate change, carbon reduction and cap-and-trade.

But to really understand how important net metering is, just imagine what our economy would be like if the internet were still a one-way pipe into your home... with only a handful of service-providers and the rest of us forced to play the role of consumers (only).

Net metering (and solar power) transform the power line to your house into a two-way pipe and change you from an energy consumer into a part-time energy producer.

As such, net metering is more than just a way to own your own power source (with about a 5-year payback). It also provides a gateway for anyone to participate in the global economy, buying and selling power (which has actual cash value as measured by your electric meter), but produced cleanly and profitably: it is as revolutionary as Napster -- but not for music, for electricity!

P.S. - You can check on the status of Net Metering in any state at http://www.dsireusa.org/

P.P.S - Google just created a subsidiary called "Google Energy" and has applied to FERC for permission to buy and sell power. See http://bit.ly/8qIK5a

Share

Dec 16 2009

A Politically Correct Holiday… Bah Humbug!

capitol_christmas_tree_1995_2A friend sent this to me and I found myself laughing out loud at the ridiculousness of political correctness over the holidays. Kinda takes the fun out of just having a nice time with good intentions.

Company Memo

FROM:    Patty Lewis, Human Resources Director
TO:        All Employees
DATE:    October 1, 2009
RE:        Gala Christmas Party

I'm happy to inform you that the company Christmas Party will take place on December 23rd, starting at noon in the private function room at the Grill House. There will be a cash bar and plenty of drinks!  We'll have a small band playing traditional carols...feel free to sing along.  And don't be surprised if our CEO shows up dressed as Santa Claus! A Christmas tree will be lit at 1:00 PM.  Exchanges of gifts among employees can be done at that time; however, no gift should be over $10.00 to make the giving of gifts easy for everyone's pockets.  This gathering is only for employees!
Our CEO will make a special announcement at that time!
Merry Christmas to you and your family,
Patty

Company Memo
FROM:     Patty Lewis, Human Resources Director
TO:         All Employees
DATE:     October 2, 2009
RE:         Gala Holiday Party
In no way was yesterday's memo intended to exclude our Jewish employees.  We recognize that Hanukkah is an important holiday, which often coincides with Christmas, though unfortunately not this year.  However, from now on, we're calling it our "Holiday Party."  The same policy applies to any other employees who are not Christians and to those still celebrating Reconciliation Day.  There will be no Christmas tree and no Christmas carols will be sung.  We will have other types of music for your enjoyment.
Happy now?
Happy Holidays to you and your family,
Patty

Company Memo

FROM:   Patty Lewis, Human Resources Director

TO:       All Employees
DATE:    October 3, 2009
RE:        Holiday Party

Regarding the note I received from a member of Alcoholics Anonymous requesting a non-drinking table, you didn't sign your name..  I'm happy to accommodate this request, but if I put a sign on a table that reads, "AA Only", you wouldn't be anonymous anymore.  How am I supposed to handle this?  Somebody?
And sorry, but forget about the gift exchange, no gifts are allowed since the union members feel that $10.00 is too much money and the executives believe $10.00 is a little chintzy.

REMEMBER: NO GIFTS EXCHANGE WILL BE ALLOWED.

Company Memo

FROM:    Patty Lewis, Human Resources Director
To:        All Employees
DATE:    October 4, 2009
RE:        Generic Holiday Party
What a diverse group we are!  I had no idea that December 20th begins the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, which forbids eating and drinking during daylight hours. There goes the party!  Seriously, we can appreciate how a luncheon at this time of year does not accommodate our Muslim employees' beliefs.  Perhaps the Grill House can hold off on serving your meal until the end of the party or else package everything for you to take it home in little foil doggy baggy.  Will that work?
Meanwhile, I've arranged for members of Weight Watchers to sit farthest from the dessert buffet, and pregnant women will get the table closest to the restrooms.
Gays are allowed to sit with each other.

Lesbians do not have to sit with Gay men; each group will have their own table.
Yes, there will be flower arrangement for the Gay men's table.
To the person asking permission to cross dress, the Grill House asks that no cross-dressing be allowed, apparently because of concerns about confusion in the restrooms. Sorry.
We will have booster seats for short people. Low-fat food will be available for those on a diet.
I am sorry to report that we cannot control the amount of salt used in the food.  The Grill House suggests that people with high blood pressure taste a bite first. There will be fresh "low sugar" fruits as dessert for diabetics, but the restaurant cannot supply "no sugar" desserts. Sorry!

Did I miss anything?!?!?
Patty

Company Memo

FROM:    Patty Lewis, Human Resources Director
TO:        All F*%^ing Employees
DATE:    October  5, 2009
RE:        The F*%^ing Holiday Party
I've had it with you vegetarian pricks!!!  We're going to keep this party at the Grill House whether you like it or not, so you can sit quietly at the table furthest from the "grill of death," as you so quaintly put it, and you'll get your f*%^ing salad bar, including organic tomatoes.  But you know, tomatoes have feelings, too.  They scream when you slice them.  I've heard them scream.  I'm hearing them scream right NOW!
The rest of you f*%^ing wierdos can kiss my *ss.  I hope you all have a rotten holiday! Drive drunk and die,

The B*tch from H*ll!!!

Company Memo

FROM:   Joan Bishop, Acting Human Resources Director
DATE:   October 6, 2009
RE:       Patty Lewis and Holiday Party
I'm sure I speak for all of us in wishing Patty Lewis a speedy recovery and I'll continue to forward your cards to her.
In the meantime, management has decided to cancel our Holiday Party and give everyone the afternoon of the 23rd off with full pay.
Happy Holidays!
Joan

Share